The Chancery Division allowed the applicants’ application, in which they sought payment to a company that was in liquidation. Following incorporation, the company started to trade as a beauty salon. Its sole de jure director was the respondent. The first applicant liquidator sought relief on the basis that the respondent had breached her duties owed to the company. The court held, among other things, that the respondent was …
Re Glam and Tan Ltd Barnett (as liquidator of Glam and Tan Ltd) and another v Litras (8 April 2022)
Published: